August 03, 2024, 09:15:06 AM

Poll

Which Victory option should we adopt as official for BFG:R?

Option 1
1 (10%)
Option 2
5 (50%)
Option 3
4 (40%)
None of these. (please propose another option)
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 10

Voting closed: March 12, 2013, 04:39:25 AM

Author Topic: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship  (Read 3618 times)

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« on: March 07, 2013, 04:39:25 AM »
Please pick one of the 3 options for the Victory Battleship for Battlefleet Bakka:

Option 1 (Vaaish retracted option):
365
12 hits 20cm speed 4 shields 6+/5+ 4 turrets
P/S lances  4  60cm
P/S WB   6 60cm
Dorsal WBs  6  60cm
Nova cannon (-10pts to switch to 9 torps)

Option 2 (afterimagedan option):
365
12 hits 20cm speed 4 shields 6+/5+ 4 turrets
P/S lances  6  45cm
Dorsal WBs  9  60cm
Nova cannon (-10pts to switch to 9 torps)

Option 3 (original):
345
12 hits 20cm speed 4 shields 6+/5+ 4 turrets
P/S lances  4  60cm
Dorsal WBs  6  60cm
Nova cannon (-10pts to switch to 9 torps)
« Last Edit: March 07, 2013, 03:43:01 PM by afterimagedan »

Offline Vaaish

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 986
    • Digital Equinox
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2013, 05:57:57 AM »
With the original on the table I'm retracting my version in favor of the original.  It's the first option. My belief is that we should only make changes that are absolutely necessary and I don't think this one makes the cut.
-Vaaish

Offline Sigoroth

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1386
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2013, 11:52:41 PM »
The original isn't bad. At 335 pts you get a slow Desolator with 6+ prow armour. That's pretty decent.

Offline BaronIveagh

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 859
    • Dark Reign
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2013, 02:02:28 AM »
The original isn't bad. At 335 pts you get a slow Desolator with 6+ prow armour. That's pretty decent.

Weirdly, for once we're in agreement
non nobis domine non nobis sed nomine tua da na glorium

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2013, 03:33:51 AM »
I propose a merge:

355
12 hits 20cm speed 4 shields 6+/5+ 4 turrets
P/S lances  4  60cm
Dorsal WBs  9(!)  60cm
Nova cannon (-10pts to switch to 9 torps)
+10pts to change lances to 6@45cm(!)
-10pts to drop nova for torpedoes
(we could even make the dorsal 9wb upgrade from 6wb an option if you like)

Offline Vaaish

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 986
    • Digital Equinox
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2013, 03:53:27 AM »
That seems rather unnecessarily complicated. I maintain leaving the original.
-Vaaish

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #6 on: March 09, 2013, 03:55:54 AM »
How complicated is it really? I mean, look at the Grand Cruisers and all their upgrades now. Two options is nothing.

Offline Vaaish

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 986
    • Digital Equinox
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #7 on: March 09, 2013, 04:30:59 AM »
Bad example. That's unnecessarily complicated as well. Doing it once doesn't justify doing it again.
-Vaaish

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #8 on: March 09, 2013, 04:35:29 AM »
It does set a precedent for it to occur again. Totally fair example.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #9 on: March 09, 2013, 04:39:43 AM »
I suppose you are also against all the Grand Cruiser changes, especially the Exorcist, the Mars, the Mercury, the Overlord, and the Tyrant, which all have 2 options? They are too complicated?

Anyways, looks like we are about 50/50 on this one so I'm trying to work out a compromise and middle ground. With this option, both sides can use their ship.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2013, 04:54:05 AM by afterimagedan »

Offline BaronIveagh

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 859
    • Dark Reign
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2013, 05:19:22 AM »
I suppose you are also against all the Grand Cruiser changes, especially the Exorcist, the Mars, the Mercury, the Overlord, and the Tyrant, which all have 2 options? They are too complicated?

In all fairness, only one of those is a Grand Cruiser. 

Relax.  I don't like some of the new Grand Cruiser changes myself.  But I sort of shrug and go 'eh'.
non nobis domine non nobis sed nomine tua da na glorium

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #11 on: March 09, 2013, 05:20:50 AM »
My point is, all the Grand Cruisers have more than one option in BFG:R.

Offline BaronIveagh

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 859
    • Dark Reign
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #12 on: March 09, 2013, 05:27:23 AM »
Eh.  The grand cruisers have always been oddballs though.

I like the Vic as is.  Unless you want to give her a +5cm Speed option.  I'd take that.
non nobis domine non nobis sed nomine tua da na glorium

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #13 on: March 09, 2013, 05:41:45 AM »
Again, we have a 50/50 voting here. I am merely trying to compromise and have it so both groups can be happy with this at the mere cost of 1 more option to the ship.  ;)

Offline Vaaish

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 986
    • Digital Equinox
Re: BFG:R Vote 45: Victory Class Battleship
« Reply #14 on: March 09, 2013, 02:57:21 PM »
You forget that compromise means neither side is happy. If there is no consensus, leave it alone. That usually means that whatever changes being made are not needed and the ship is fine as is. I'd wager votes for the retribution changes had far more consensus than this round.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2013, 03:03:24 PM by Vaaish »
-Vaaish