September 17, 2024, 10:19:50 PM

Poll

What should BFG:R do with Necrons?

Keep the GW/2010 list with no changes.
0 (0%)
Edit the GW/2010 lists with some edits.
0 (0%)
Use the current BFG:R list with their Reactive Hull rules, new ships, and point costs + small revisions/edits.
0 (0%)
Use the current BFG:R list and discuss bigger revisions (possibly adding/dropping ships and/or changing rules)
5 (100%)

Total Members Voted: 5

Voting closed: October 28, 2012, 04:12:08 PM

Author Topic: BFG:R Vote 4: Necrons  (Read 8790 times)

Offline Talos

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 542
Re: BFG:R Vote 4: Necrons
« Reply #30 on: October 31, 2012, 07:06:34 PM »
I agree with Dan on this one; since were only adding a bit, better to add it now then later to smooth things out. Can you imagine how much work it would be to have to go back and modify every previous document whenever we add a ruling or new ship? Hell on (insert afterimagedan's residence) is what that would be.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 4: Necrons
« Reply #31 on: October 31, 2012, 07:15:50 PM »
Can you imagine how much work it would be to have to go back and modify every previous document whenever we add a ruling or new ship? Hell on (insert afterimagedan's residence) is what that would be.

It is pretty hard unless people want to deal with pages with half of it white. That's possible but still some more work.

Offline horizon

  • Moderator
  • Veteran member
  • *
  • Posts: 4200
  • Destiny Infinity Eternity
Re: BFG:R Vote 4: Necrons
« Reply #32 on: October 31, 2012, 07:30:09 PM »
' kay then.  ::)
Editorial issues win me over.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 4: Necrons
« Reply #33 on: October 31, 2012, 07:43:43 PM »
' kay then.  ::)
Editorial issues win me over.

Hehe, and I thought I was going to have to invade Europe to make it happen! (...my typical America blood...)  ;D

Offline ThaneAquilon

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 187
Re: BFG:R Vote 4: Necrons
« Reply #34 on: October 31, 2012, 09:47:04 PM »
Hold on, if we're adding ships right now...what about the ships from the book of nemesis? Those eldar ships wwould need a lot of work, and heavy input from horizon and sig, but the others would be relatively easy.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 4: Necrons
« Reply #35 on: October 31, 2012, 10:56:36 PM »
which ships? Hmm, don't remember any specifically.

Offline Bessemer

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 339
    • Loc: UK
Re: BFG:R Vote 4: Necrons
« Reply #36 on: October 31, 2012, 11:28:51 PM »
The Nebula Battlecruiser and the Ikaros light cruiser, both from the Book Of Nemesis. written in the original rules.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2012, 11:38:06 PM by Bessemer »
I refuse to be killed by something I've never heard of.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 4: Necrons
« Reply #37 on: November 01, 2012, 12:37:27 AM »
I am personally rather cautious about messing with Corsair and Craftworld Eldar without hearing from Sig or Horizon on it.

Offline ThaneAquilon

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 187
Re: BFG:R Vote 4: Necrons
« Reply #38 on: November 01, 2012, 02:24:44 AM »
And, as I am always quick to bring up, the Tau missile Boat. I think there are also a couple IN/Chaos and Ork vessels, but I could easily be wrong.

Offline horizon

  • Moderator
  • Veteran member
  • *
  • Posts: 4200
  • Destiny Infinity Eternity
Re: BFG:R Vote 4: Necrons
« Reply #39 on: November 01, 2012, 03:23:39 AM »
I say wait with BoN for now. It was its own dedicated fanmade supplement with its own share of fans and haters.

If you update that book, update it as one piece.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 4: Necrons
« Reply #40 on: November 01, 2012, 04:43:48 AM »
I say wait with BoN for now. It was its own dedicated fanmade supplement with its own share of fans and haters.

If you update that book, update it as one piece.

I think you are right on this one. It was it's own separate project and I like it just the way it is.