If I recall correctly, batteries are a large variety of different direct fire weapons; sword escorts, for instance use lasers, tyrant cruisers use plasma and retribution battleship use macroshells. Admittedly, it seems silly to argue that lasers or plasma blasts could be suspended in mid-air(void?), but macro cannon shells could be fired en masse at lower velocities to create mini flak clouds. Thus we can assume that a weapon's maximum range is a combination of velocity and accuracy. It could be said that a ship can with direct fire weapons could fire at maximum range only, creating a blast marker at that point only (no firing them closer). Instead of rolling dice to hit, I would humbly suggest a leadership test to represent trying to effectively coordinate the barrage; it is more of a matter of crew training and practice then actual accuracy.
Quote blue book p.24
"...Blast markers represent all kinds of events - huge explosions, expanding shockwaves, intense radiation clouds, tumbling debris,
unexploded warheads, plasma bursts, etc." Could we not then assume that a massive cluster of plasma/high intensity energy/ exploding or undetonated shells could represent a blast marker? Everyone is entitled an opinion, but this seems a reasonable middle ground. Although it does seem more effective for shorter range fleets, who can use it to screen more effectively, long range fleets benefit from more aggressive placement, potentially limiting movement more drastically versus defensive cover. Number of blast markers could be fixed, or use a formula such as 1 blast marker per part of 4 strength (hypothetical number).
@Sigoroth Although I am fairly new to the game, this probably fits into your functional but unnecessary category, although I can see a problem that veteran players such as yourself could run into; it adds an additional element of unpredictability. In any scenario that involves competition, variability always benefits the underdog. This is not, I repeat not an insult or sly remark: just fact. PM if you would like to discuss this particular statement rather than my house ruling
I would be happy to discuss it.
Thoughts?