August 04, 2024, 03:19:43 PM
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7   Go Down

Author Topic: IA10  (Read 27062 times)

Offline Zelnik

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 775
Re: IA10
« Reply #30 on: January 30, 2011, 03:49:06 PM »
Knowing how forgeworld works, I am not so sure.
Logged

Offline RCgothic

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 795
Re: IA10
« Reply #31 on: January 30, 2011, 04:12:20 PM »
well to be fair there's nothing that says weapon ranges HAVE to be multiples of 15cm, but some of these ideas are pretty trippy.
Logged

Offline lastspartacus

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1279
Re: IA10
« Reply #32 on: January 30, 2011, 11:02:49 PM »
Wow.  The direst predictions weren't far off in their level of ludicrousity. (tm) ;)

This isn't a complete wash.  If this accompanies new models, its extremely welcome.
Logged

Offline BaronIveagh

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 859
    • Dark Reign
Re: IA10
« Reply #33 on: January 31, 2011, 01:29:05 AM »
... my head hurts, since these would both technically count as SM and IN lists rather then a chaos list...

I'm reading this.  I'm not sure if IN and SM are broken now or what.   What prevents people from taking some of these monstrosities as reserves in other lists???
Logged
non nobis domine non nobis sed nomine tua da na glorium

Offline Eldanesh

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 75
Re: IA10
« Reply #34 on: January 31, 2011, 02:06:07 AM »
Could it be that the Raptorus Rex should be a kind of "loyal Space hulk" and they forgot to mention it? Hits as well as speed point in this direction...
Logged

Offline BaronIveagh

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 859
    • Dark Reign
Re: IA10
« Reply #35 on: January 31, 2011, 02:37:02 AM »
The picture shows what looks sort of like a ramilies, IIRC.  Could be why it doesn't list weapon facings.
Logged
non nobis domine non nobis sed nomine tua da na glorium

Offline lastspartacus

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1279
Re: IA10
« Reply #36 on: January 31, 2011, 02:39:52 AM »
So they did have model pics?
Logged

Offline BaronIveagh

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 859
    • Dark Reign
Re: IA10
« Reply #37 on: January 31, 2011, 03:08:59 AM »
Quote from: lastspartacus on January 31, 2011, 02:39:52 AM
So they did have model pics?

From what I've been told it was a blurry picture of a ramilies.  No sign of minis yet.
Logged
non nobis domine non nobis sed nomine tua da na glorium

Offline Xyon

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 77
Re: IA10
« Reply #38 on: January 31, 2011, 04:47:44 AM »
Quote from: BaronIveagh on January 31, 2011, 01:29:05 AM
... my head hurts, since these would both technically count as SM and IN lists rather then a chaos list...

I'm reading this.  I'm not sure if IN and SM are broken now or what.   What prevents people from taking some of these monstrosities as reserves in other lists???

Well,  technically they are not chaos,  the badab war is about a loyalist marine chapter that was trying to break off from the imperium because of not getting enough support or resources to do their duty,   they're renegades and not chaos.   So they would have the newer ships  the Imperial navy built after the heresy because they are just that, Imperial navy/Marine Navy that are breaking off from the empire.
Logged

Offline Sigoroth

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1386
Re: IA10
« Reply #39 on: January 31, 2011, 05:36:13 AM »
Quote from: BaronIveagh on January 31, 2011, 01:29:05 AM
... my head hurts, since these would both technically count as SM and IN lists rather then a chaos list...

I'm reading this.  I'm not sure if IN and SM are broken now or what.   What prevents people from taking some of these monstrosities as reserves in other lists???

The fact that these will never be official.
Logged

Offline BaronIveagh

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 859
    • Dark Reign
Re: IA10
« Reply #40 on: January 31, 2011, 05:52:35 AM »
Quote from: Sigoroth on January 31, 2011, 05:36:13 AM
Quote from: BaronIveagh on January 31, 2011, 01:29:05 AM
... my head hurts, since these would both technically count as SM and IN lists rather then a chaos list...

I'm reading this.  I'm not sure if IN and SM are broken now or what.   What prevents people from taking some of these monstrosities as reserves in other lists???

The fact that these will never be official.

Of course, now that you've gone and SAID that, it will be made official by GW, just like the Tau list was for me, and the SM dominion list was for Horizon.
Logged
non nobis domine non nobis sed nomine tua da na glorium

Offline Zelnik

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 775
Re: IA10
« Reply #41 on: January 31, 2011, 05:54:02 AM »
Guys, Forgeworld is part of GW... Therefore it IS official. As official as it could get without coming right from GW itself. 

Insane? stupid? yes.  Forgeworld, like GW wants to turn profits, and BFG still turns profits for them. 
Logged

Offline Vaaish

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 986
    • Digital Equinox
Re: IA10
« Reply #42 on: January 31, 2011, 06:07:27 AM »
Did FW remove the disclaimer they used to put with their rules that required permission to use them?
Logged
-Vaaish

Offline BaronIveagh

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 859
    • Dark Reign
Re: IA10
« Reply #43 on: January 31, 2011, 07:34:51 AM »
Quote from: Vaaish on January 31, 2011, 06:07:27 AM
Did FW remove the disclaimer they used to put with their rules that required permission to use them?
YES

Or at least they did as of IA 7, which is why DKoK armored companies are so popular right now, assuming you can afford one at FW prices.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2011, 07:49:10 AM by BaronIveagh »
Logged
non nobis domine non nobis sed nomine tua da na glorium

Offline Sigoroth

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1386
Re: IA10
« Reply #44 on: January 31, 2011, 05:12:29 PM »
If it aint published under Specialist Games then it aint official. Even White Dwarf rules wouldn't be official.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7   Go Up
« previous next »