Well, considering the fact that there are only really 5 people involved (Horizon, Plaxor, Admiral D Artagnan, RCgothic, and Sigoroth), then consensus will mean 4/5 will need to agree (as my arbitrary amount for a solution is 75% agreed).
If others get more heavily involved then this value will change. So far of those we have (in order of most involved) Vaaish, BaronIveagh, Zelnik, Fracas, Commander.
I will fix problems. Priorities... well I don't think it's too necessary atm, as we have about 1/4-1/3 of ships already pretty concluded on.
Put the ships closest to consensus in red. These will be priority 1 to 'finish' first. Please comment on these vessels.
Despoiler: I think there isn't really much discussion here. Horizons stats are widely/happily accepted.
Devestation: I think it's a sure thing we're reducing it's lances to 45, the question is, will it still need to be 200 points after that. I'm torn here, but still think it's plausible.
Oberon: there is a consensus here, but the question is to increase its points value to 355. It seems real pretty for 335 with current stats (so much that I might change my vote). I've never used one as I don't run BF Armageddon.
Overlord: I think everyone can agree to a mixed solution, where its weapons batteries are dropped to 12@45, as well as its points cost by 10, however you can up its wbs to 60cm, with a loss of 2fp.
Endeavor Variants: Everyone seems set on a 6+ prow. However 90' turns are a bit of discussion material. I feel that a heavily armored prow ship shouldn't be able to turn 90', and this is shown in the Rogue Trader document. Defiant is up for getting torpedos to make it more worthwhile to reload.
Tyrant: Looks like a 5pts reduction. I'm against removing the option to leave it with its standard weapon layout however It rarely gets used that way, but it's a fun little fluffy quirk/downgrade.