August 02, 2024, 11:13:50 AM

Poll

Should we consider the current Chaos Document finalized in BFG:R?

Yes, make it official.
7 (77.8%)
No, needs more work.
2 (22.2%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Voting closed: May 13, 2013, 10:20:32 PM

Author Topic: BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos  (Read 3215 times)

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« on: May 09, 2013, 10:20:32 PM »
Please vote! Also, if any typos are found, we can still change them.  :D

Offline Bessemer

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 339
    • Loc: UK
Re: BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2013, 10:38:50 PM »
No link? :)
I refuse to be killed by something I've never heard of.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2013, 10:55:30 PM »
Right, yes. Link!

BFG:R Chaos

It's the same as the one you can get to from my forum signature.

Offline Armiger84

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 131
    • Loc: Boston, MA
    • De Bellis Futuris
Re: BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2013, 03:18:32 AM »
I like the changes to the Abbadon's 13th Chaos Cotillion fleet list and the Chaos Renegades fleet list to make them distinct and interesting.  I went over it and put together a minor typos list that I'll go post in the Chaos BFG:R thread.
My modelling blog:  http://armiger84.blogspot.com

Offline Neferhet

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 99
    • Loc: Florence
Re: BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #4 on: May 10, 2013, 09:57:37 AM »
Very good work on the fleet lists.
For me we it just need to be finalized (altough i'm not a fan of the Chaos Light Cruisers :P )

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #5 on: May 13, 2013, 06:34:54 PM »
Noticed some issues here:

1.Black Crusade needs to have a written in CSM entry on their page. I will get to that.
2. Secondary commanders are often useless. All the powers lists can take CSM for 5 pts less than a secondary commander and it does way more than the secondary commander does. 30pts for Ld 8? or 25pts for Ld 8-10 and all the massive load of CSM upgrades? What do we do with this...  ???

Offline Armiger84

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 131
    • Loc: Boston, MA
    • De Bellis Futuris
BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #6 on: May 13, 2013, 09:32:01 PM »
Go back to Chaos Lords being Ld +1?  That's still a problem with +CSM, let alone +1 Ld prows, but iirc there's really only a couple of CGs where that's possible, and two where its a likely combination (Retaliator, Nephilim), and at that point they're costlier than some Battleships, so...  is that a "problem"?  Or does that make sensor prow Retaliators with CSMs or Chaos Lords mandatory for a competitive build?

Alternatively... Is it worth thinking about nerfing CSMs or limiting their use per full 500 or 750 points?
My modelling blog:  http://armiger84.blogspot.com

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2013, 05:21:06 PM »
Chaos lord at +1 would be a good change because it would then be an admiral you can add to ships for that bonus +1 instead of it being just set 8, even putting them on a CSM vessel. Anyone else game?

Offline AndrewChristlieb

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1651
Re: BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2013, 07:11:33 PM »
I thought all of the secondary commanders were going to be +1 (max 9) for 30points. Ld8 is only worth 25pts from the fleet admiral pricing.
I don't make the rules, I just think them up and write them down.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #9 on: May 14, 2013, 07:39:46 PM »
For Imperials:
http://www.forum.specialist-arms.com/index.php?topic=4965.msg38641#msg38641

For Chaos:
http://www.forum.specialist-arms.com/index.php?topic=5136.msg40547#msg40547

I don't think it would be much of a swap to just make the Chaos ones the same as the Imperials. Just go for it?

Offline Armiger84

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 131
    • Loc: Boston, MA
    • De Bellis Futuris
BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #10 on: May 14, 2013, 08:47:02 PM »
IIRC they work(ed) that way in the Armada 13th Black Crusade list anyhow, so I certainly don't have any problems with it.
My modelling blog:  http://armiger84.blogspot.com

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #11 on: May 14, 2013, 09:28:34 PM »
What should we call them? Aspiring Champion?
« Last Edit: May 14, 2013, 09:32:55 PM by afterimagedan »

Offline Neferhet

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 99
    • Loc: Florence
Re: BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #12 on: May 14, 2013, 09:43:06 PM »
Rogue lords?
Arch-Heretics?

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #13 on: May 14, 2013, 09:53:29 PM »
I think Aspiring Champion fits in with the Dawn of War 2 heroes for Chaos as well. They basically have a Chaos Lord, Chaos Sorceror, and a "Plague Champion" which is an Aspiring Champion of Nurgle.

Offline AndrewChristlieb

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1651
Re: BFG:R Vote 64: Finalize Chaos
« Reply #14 on: May 14, 2013, 11:50:53 PM »
It sounds cool, Im game.
I don't make the rules, I just think them up and write them down.