November 01, 2024, 03:15:33 PM

Author Topic: Grog's Guide to Ship Creation  (Read 4508 times)

Offline Zelnik

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 775
Grog's Guide to Ship Creation
« on: August 16, 2011, 07:44:30 AM »
Hey folks. From time to time, we see new ships pop up in this forum. Some of them are rather elegant and  well thought out, while others make me want to perform cranial surgery with an axe.

to help refine our crazy ideas, I decided to make this guide to help refine the process in making a new ship.

BEFORE YOU BEGIN!

This is a GUIDE, which means it is an opinion. This means you can ignore it.

Okay, you have a ship in mind. Before you even go beyond that point, you need to ask yourself a few questions.

1. What purpose will this ship serve. (is it an escort? is it a carrier? is it a super-weapon?)

2. Is there something in the game that is similar to your idea? (try to avoid stepping on the toes of another ship or faction. If it steps on more then one ship in your fleet of choice, you may be going too far.)

3. Can you use already established rules to describe what your ship does? (creating new rules is difficult to balance, you can always take an established rule and give it a new name)

4. Is what you are creating contrary to the theme of your fleet (6+ armor chaos ships, Necron ships with carrier capacity, 60cm weapons on Tau or Tyranids, ork ships with good LD)

5. Is this a "fluffy" ship or a "beaty" ship (is it there because it is part of a story, or because it is meant to kill shit. the new Blackship is a great example of this)

6. How will you balance the ship? (If it is a super weapon, what is the cost of BEING a super weapon?)

7. Did I have my peers look at my idea? If they didn't like it, did they give a good reason? (there is nothing gained by being sensitive about this)

8. Does it fit in the genre? (Star trek does not belong in 40k!!)

9. are there any fleets that will have a particularly hard time destroying it.

10. What is my purpose in creating this ship.


If you can answer all of these questions in a reasonable manner, you may be on to something.  Most importantly of all is balancing a craft. There are several ways to do this:
1. Negative consequences (larger explosions, fewer hits, shorter range, more victory points if hulked/destroyed)
2. Increased point costs
3. deployment restrictions (1000, 1500, 2000 point minimum)
4. forced disengagement

These are only examples which are simple and are already established in the game. You have the full right to mix, match and make your own.

Lets talk about size. Ship size means a lot because it restricts survivability and weapons load out. Typically, if you want a SUPAH GUNZ, you will need a battleship or defense.  if you want quick and zippy, light cruisers or escorts are your best bet. Remember the size scale!

Ordnance
Escorts
Light Cruisers
Cruisers
Battle/Heavy Cruisers
Grand Cruisers
Battleships
Defenses

Generally, the larger you go, the lower the firepower to point ratio becomes. Escort squadrons (point per point) have more firepower then a battleship of equal value. what you are paying for is toughness and survivability.  There are always exceptions to this rule. 


next, you need to worry about usefulness.  What is it meant to do? Is this ship designed to snap other ships over it's knee? or maybe have an advantage over escorts? maybe it is a super carrier.  In the end, it should have a MISSION.  If this mission can be handled by another ship of a similar class, there may not be a need for your new ship (I am looking at YOU Inferno!)

Next, think hard about HOW your ship will do what it will do, in relation to it's class. Here is an example.

I want to take a Repulsive grand cruiser and make it a carrier.
The Goal: Combine torpedo and strike craft on a chaos grand cruiser hull, so i don't have to spend the points on an upgraded Despoiler.

The means: Taking a repulsive grand cruiser and replacing one gun deck on both sides with carrier ports.

Does it step on any other ship?: Partially, there is already a grand cruiser carrier but it does not have torpedos. I would say between the Retaliator and the Despoiler, it will step on a total of one "theoretical" ship. Not bad at all really.

The rules: This is the tricky part.  The Repulsive itself has a metric TON of rules involving upgrading it's chassis.  Do you let this ship take the same upgrades? Will you give it it's third shield standard or let it upgrade to 3? What about it's dorsal lances? How weak will you make it's batteries? How strong will you make the launch capacity?

Launch capacity is easy. To avoid stepping on a third ship and breaking our rule, we will keep the Launch capacity at the standard 4.

Firepower is more difficult. The Repulsive has a TON of gun, and reducing it too far will render the ship utterly useless.  Personally, I would reduce it to somewhere around FP 10, but this is still pretty damn substantial, so to balance i will increase the cost of the ship itself.

Upgrades? I personally would allow any upgrade the repulsive can get for this ship, solely because we are using it's chassis.  there is no reason why we should be restricted in this manner. The costs will be the same too.

Now, the repulsive is 230 base. Carriers always are at a premium of points, and carriers with torpedos are even more expensive. We are also increasing the value of a 10 hit ship, so that will increase the points factor as well. The closest ship we have to this scale is the Retaliator at 265.  Clearly this ship will have a far greater combat value then the Retaliator (which really does serve a different purpose) so it will clearly be more expensive.

Lets list our point "growth" factors from the base of 230 points.
+Carrier (LC4)
+Torpedo's
+Carrier on grand cruiser hull
+the luxury of upgrades (yes this does increase the cost)
+High firepower

Now the "loss" factors
-Limited deployment (3 ships minimum)
-Huge target
-Slow
-weak initial defenses
-(optional) Large base required

Limited deployment and slow movement will absorb a lot of the growth factors in the game, but it won't cover all of them.  being a huge target and having weak initial defenses are rather marginal, but help a little on the whole. 

Lets start at an even 290 points. This means your max point cost for this vessel is 315 points when fully upgraded.  remember at this point you need a large base. 

Now here is the hard part. Will this ship serve a purpose that is unique? That is a hard question to answer, only playtesting will tell.


And a call out to Lleman and his Liberator grand cruiser.. which I based my example off of, even if I designed this "version" for chaos, and not space marines (no thunderhawks!!!)




Offline Sigoroth

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1386
Re: Grog's Guide to Ship Creation
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2011, 09:41:53 AM »
Why would this ship be able to get firepower 10 out of 1 hardpoint? Too much firepower. Also, your list of costs is off. You do not pay more for having optional upgrades. The upgrades are simply bought at upgrade costs, rather than inherent value. There should be no premium for being a CG carrier, Chaos already have one. Also, those loss factors are all irrelevant, as they're accounted for in the base cost. Further, the Dictator, which has torps and AC swaps 6WB for 4 AC at +40 pts. This ship is overpriced by 10 pts and also has a (compulsory) third turret, which would be worth at least 5 pts. So the premium of AC (on a torp ship) over equivalent firepower is roughly 25 pts, or just over 6 pts per bay.

So a firepower 8 Repulsive with 4 AC should cost 255 pts with +5 fudge pts, for a total of 260 pts. Extra range and shield would take it to 285 pts.

Offline Zelnik

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 775
Re: Grog's Guide to Ship Creation
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2011, 05:23:00 PM »
Again, it was a matter of opinion, your mentality is just as viable as mine.

Offline Sigoroth

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1386
Re: Grog's Guide to Ship Creation
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2011, 08:01:20 PM »
More so I would say. Or is there something in particular I've said that you disagree with?

Offline Zelnik

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 775
Re: Grog's Guide to Ship Creation
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2011, 08:39:17 PM »
Yes. If you look at the repulsive, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that all of it's firepower is in the port and starboard ports. The standard strength for port and starboard weapons on chaos battery cruisers is roughly 10 WB (as is displayed clearly by the Carnage and the Murder).  The Repulsive supplements it's strength by the QUITE VISIBLE fixed weapon batteries on it's prow.

Sig, you are a great man, but you need to stop with this air of superiority.  People hate it.

Offline Sigoroth

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1386
Re: Grog's Guide to Ship Creation
« Reply #5 on: August 16, 2011, 09:50:21 PM »
If you have a problem with my so called "air of superiority" then perhaps you should stop being inferior. Or, to put it another way, maybe you should be the one that drops the attitude and simply addresses the question rather than saying crap like "it's a matter of opinion" in response to a reasoned argument.

Anyway, now that you have raised a specific issue let's address that. Let's assume that the guns on the prow of the ship supplement the 2 hardpoints, which is not unreasonable. If we're using the Carnage and Murder as a standard of Chaos's 10WB strength as a baseline, then presumably we'd use the Hecate as a guide as to what happens when we replace WB strength with AC. We lose 6WB@45cm, not 4. Also, note that while the Carnage has 10WB total, 6 of it is at 45cm and the other 4 is at 60cm, suggesting that 12WB@45cm from 2 hardpoints is possible (meaning the Murder, Hades and Hecate are suboptimal). Given the oddity of the firepower of the Repulsive I find it more likely that it uses efficient WB hardpoint strength (ie, 12 from the 2 hardpoints) and is only slightly upgunned by the prow guns (so +2WBs, not +4WBs).

In the latter interpretation swapping a hardpoint for launchbays would require a drop to 8 WBs total. In the former instance such a swap would be the most reasonable given the Hecate. To me the 6/6/2 Repulsive seems the most likely. Either way, having a 4/6/4 Repulsive and swapping it to -/6/4 for the extra AC is really a long stretch. The only way to do it would be to assume that the Repulsive's 2 hardpoints are suboptimal (ie, a 4/6 distribution) and that the prow is worth 4WB and that the suboptimal WB hardpoint is swapped out for the (efficient) AC hardpoint, for which there is no precedent. Taken altogether this is unreasonable and is also not intuitive from looking at the model itself. Seeing a 1 hardpoint direct fire model and calling it 10WB doesn't seem right, even with the prow.

The notion of additional broadside firepower from the prow is a good one and is exactly the sort of thing I was looking for, even if it seems to only justify firepower 8 on the conversion. Do you have any similar issues to raise to justify the exorbitant cost of your 10WB variant? How do you get 290 pts? I priced an 8WB version at 260 pts, including a 5 pt fudge factor and ignoring that it loses 45cm guns as opposed to a Dictator losing 30cm guns and only pricing the Dictator's third turret at 5 pts. Surely 30 pts is far too much to pay for 2WB@45cmL+R. Is it that you disagree with the Dictator being valued at 210 pts? Even then, a 20 pt price difference is still a little much, and it doesn't account for all the other fudge factors either.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2011, 09:54:25 PM by Sigoroth »

Offline lastspartacus

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1279
Re: Grog's Guide to Ship Creation
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2011, 12:30:24 PM »
I too share an appreciation for Sig's insight, but still cringe whenever a blue post comes up.  Cluttering up my forum reading! :)