August 03, 2024, 03:20:41 PM
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: BFG:R Playtesting Log  (Read 8302 times)

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Playtesting Log
« Reply #15 on: March 07, 2013, 01:40:20 AM »
OK, but that's your take on it. If you don't like it, that's one thing. Do you think it should not be an option? I personally don't like a good handful of ships but I still will support them being included.
Logged

Offline Bessemer

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 339
    • Loc: UK
Re: BFG:R Playtesting Log
« Reply #16 on: March 07, 2013, 01:52:38 AM »
Quote from: afterimagedan on March 07, 2013, 01:40:20 AM
Do you think it should not be an option? I personally don't like a good handful of ships but I still will support them being included.

I agree with that, just giving my 2 pence on stuff I've tried. Never said it should be removed (that would be a community decision). We've all got ships we don't like or use.

Not trying to come of as stand-offish :-[
Logged
I refuse to be killed by something I've never heard of.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Playtesting Log
« Reply #17 on: March 07, 2013, 01:57:08 AM »
Neither am I! I just wanted to make sure where you were at.  :D  Do you think the BFG:R stuff you have used so far has been going well?  I am very happy with how the Dark Eldar (old BFG:R version with 2 hit escorts) are going. 
Logged

Offline Bessemer

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 339
    • Loc: UK
Re: BFG:R Playtesting Log
« Reply #18 on: March 07, 2013, 02:10:07 AM »
Yes I do! Need more practice with 'Nids  to get a better picture, and trying to get some testing with Necrons done too!

IN are my main fleet, so I have the most practice them. we seem to have got the bugs out there, and same with tau. Chaos seem to be pretty much done barring CSM and Deamonships, can't say I've ever been a big user of either so can't comment much on them.

Have had very little experience with Orks and Admech, and none with DE, so I'll probably just leave them to other better informed ;D
Logged
I refuse to be killed by something I've never heard of.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Playtesting Log
« Reply #19 on: March 07, 2013, 02:21:26 AM »
Hey, sent you an email, Bessemer.
Logged

Offline AndrewChristlieb

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1651
Re: BFG:R Playtesting Log
« Reply #20 on: March 07, 2013, 04:15:59 AM »
The Havoc should work at 35, but its no Sword. Given the price drop on the Iconoclast and seeing how this doesnt perform as well as the Sword maybe a drop to 30pts is in order.
Logged
I don't make the rules, I just think them up and write them down.

Offline afterimagedan

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1902
    • Loc: Chicago IL, USA
Re: BFG:R Playtesting Log
« Reply #21 on: March 07, 2013, 04:18:15 AM »
Quote from: AndrewChristlieb on March 07, 2013, 04:15:59 AM
The Havoc should work at 35, but its no Sword. Given the price drop on the Iconoclast and seeing how this doesnt perform as well as the Sword maybe a drop to 30pts is in order.

Want to move that discussion to the Bakka thread? I think that is a good talk to have.
Logged

Offline AndrewChristlieb

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1651
Re: BFG:R Playtesting Log
« Reply #22 on: March 07, 2013, 04:52:24 AM »
Might as well tackle it all at once, it would be nice to see others opinions, of course the best option is to drop it for the Sword anyway.
Logged
I don't make the rules, I just think them up and write them down.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »